This Stone doll was excavated over 300 ft deep beneath a layer of lava
Human artifacts and remains related to the Flood
All over the world, human remains and artifacts have been located in the process of mining, quarrying, road building, excavation or exposed by natural erosion.
Nampa Image (Left)
Wright, Frederick, G. American Antiquarian 11:379-381 1889 and Scientific American, Nov. 9, 1889.
An Image from Nampa, Idaho area was brought to the surface in a well drilling operation in 1889. The stone doll came from the 300-foot level of a well boring. “The record of the well shows that in reaching the stratum from which the image was brought up they had penetrated first about fifty feet of soil, then about fifteen feet of basalt, and afterwards passed through alternate beds of clay and quicksand down to a depth of about three hundred feet, when the sand pump began to bring up numerous clay balls, some of them more than two inches in diameter, densely coated with iron oxide." According to the United States Geological Survey the age of this strata "Plio-Pleistocene” was 2 million years ago using non-catastrophic measurements. It should be noted that the well log shows the image was found a bed of sand and far below a 15 foot lava layer of the Columbia basalts. These cover over 80,000 square miles of the Northwestern United States to a thickness measured in miles, which suggest they were laid down during the flood period. In this find we have evidence that a civilization existed before the catastrophe that covered the idol, confounding current Geological and Archeological origin's models but fully support a Biblical one.
Ref. Rose, M. The Noah Code p. 256
For over 150 years artifacts and the remains of fully modern human beings have been discovered in rocks of the earth. When such items are found and presented to authorities, these "authorities" (the general public thinks scientific and objective), the artifacts and/or remains are immediately rejected out of hand, deemed invalid due to their wrong placement in the preconceived picture of evolution based archaeology, geology and other related sciences. As these adhere to the same evolution model, a model that assumes man evolved from apes some hundreds of thousands of years ago and much further, so any evidence found to the contrary is ignored and tossed aside. A common example we will soon document is that articles and even human remains that are found in coal. As coal is considered quite old in the evolutionary scale of things, (often more than 200 million years), any such finding should controvert the entire premise of human evolution by huge epochs of time. Here I have included in a plethora of evidence in support the Flood account. As such, if the Flood (in strict adherence to the Biblical account) occurred, we should be able to enter the fields of Archaeology, Paleontology and Geology and find this obvious evidence.
All over the world, human remains and artifacts have been located in the process of mining, quarrying, road building, excavation or exposed by natural erosion.
Nampa Image (Left)
Wright, Frederick, G. American Antiquarian 11:379-381 1889 and Scientific American, Nov. 9, 1889.
An Image from Nampa, Idaho area was brought to the surface in a well drilling operation in 1889. The stone doll came from the 300-foot level of a well boring. “The record of the well shows that in reaching the stratum from which the image was brought up they had penetrated first about fifty feet of soil, then about fifteen feet of basalt, and afterwards passed through alternate beds of clay and quicksand down to a depth of about three hundred feet, when the sand pump began to bring up numerous clay balls, some of them more than two inches in diameter, densely coated with iron oxide." According to the United States Geological Survey the age of this strata "Plio-Pleistocene” was 2 million years ago using non-catastrophic measurements. It should be noted that the well log shows the image was found a bed of sand and far below a 15 foot lava layer of the Columbia basalts. These cover over 80,000 square miles of the Northwestern United States to a thickness measured in miles, which suggest they were laid down during the flood period. In this find we have evidence that a civilization existed before the catastrophe that covered the idol, confounding current Geological and Archeological origin's models but fully support a Biblical one.
Ref. Rose, M. The Noah Code p. 256
For over 150 years artifacts and the remains of fully modern human beings have been discovered in rocks of the earth. When such items are found and presented to authorities, these "authorities" (the general public thinks scientific and objective), the artifacts and/or remains are immediately rejected out of hand, deemed invalid due to their wrong placement in the preconceived picture of evolution based archaeology, geology and other related sciences. As these adhere to the same evolution model, a model that assumes man evolved from apes some hundreds of thousands of years ago and much further, so any evidence found to the contrary is ignored and tossed aside. A common example we will soon document is that articles and even human remains that are found in coal. As coal is considered quite old in the evolutionary scale of things, (often more than 200 million years), any such finding should controvert the entire premise of human evolution by huge epochs of time. Here I have included in a plethora of evidence in support the Flood account. As such, if the Flood (in strict adherence to the Biblical account) occurred, we should be able to enter the fields of Archaeology, Paleontology and Geology and find this obvious evidence.
Human remains found buried across the USA
Human Remains in 1840 Table Mountain CA, Gold mine finds
In February 1866, a skull was removed by one Mr. Mattison, in Calaveras County from a layer of gravel 130 feet below the surface. Later a human jaw, also inspected by J. D. Whitney, State geologist at that time who researched its location and authenticity. The jaw was given to a Dr. Snell by miners, who stated it came from the gravels beneath the lava cap at Table Mountain in Tuolumne County, CA. Noted geologists Mr. George H. Baker, Mr. King along with Professor Marsh, Professor Putnam and W. H. Dall attested to the fact that the Calaveras skull was found in place beneath a stream of gravel in the Table formation beneath this same stream of lava. Their position indicates they were over 30 million years old, in modern terms.
Wright, Frederick G. Science 20:275-27 1892
Speaking about the Whitney papers on these finds; in August, 1879, AAAS President and foremost paleontologist O. C. Marsh, stated: “The proof offered on this point by Professor J. D. Whitney in his recent work (Aurif. Gravels of Sierra Nevada) is so strong, and his careful, conscientious method of investigation so well known, that his conclusions seem irresistible. At present, the known facts indicate that the American beds containing human remains and works of man, are as old as the Pliocene of Europe. The existence of man in the Tertiary period seems now fairly established.”[I]
Ref. Rose, M. The Noah Code p. 279
Human Skull Found at Stanford, Menlo Park, CA
While excavating for a building project, scientists from Stanford discovered mastodon remains 22 feet below ground level near the campus. The observing scientists recalled an earlier find of a modern human skull found by Bruce Seymour, a Stanford University student, who found this skull twenty feet below the surface in the bank of San Francisquito Creek, at the same depth and strata of the Mastodon. The skull was cemented in a gravel stratum on which an alluvial cone had been formed. Bailey Willis (a competent geologist that had worked closely with Hrdlicka*) visited the locality, and determined that a considerable period of time must have been required for the formation of the alluvial cone which overlay the gravel, and for the cutting of the present creek bed. He suggested that the skull might have been deposited more than 4,000 years ago. According to Wormington, Willis is a capable geologist, likely to be “extremely cautious in supporting claims for the antiquity of human remains.” (Wormington 1957) The skull, which was studied by T. D. McCown (see Early Man in the New World, 1950) deter- mined it was a “male between thirty-five and forty-five years old.” The phys- ical and chemical condition of the specimen made it appear unlikely that it could be very recent. Researchers discussing the implications quoted Dr. J.W. Gidley as stating: “If this mastodon is of the late Miocene or early Pliocene as D. Blackwelder says it is, that sets it (the skull) back some two or three million years. And we have no evidence man has been here that long.”
Los Angeles Skeletons
In 1914, a complete human skeleton, animal bones and artifacts were found in a Los Angeles area tar pit. Later in 1924, at Angeles Mesa, six skeletons were found (Heizer, 1950) at depths of nineteen to twenty-three feet below the surface. Later, more finds surfaced as part of the excavation in 1936 when workmen were digging a storm drain beneath the Los Angeles River. This find revealed more human bones, including a partial human cranium and seven fragments of other bones at depths of twelve to thirteen feet below grade. The bones and cranium were mineralized and coated heavily with sandstone and conglomerate. Extinct animal bones were also discovered two months later in the same stratum. A. Lopatin, of the University of Southern California excavated two teeth later identified as those from an Imperial Mammoth. The geologic study of the associated stratum was con- ducted by Thomas Clements, a well known geologist who concluded they were of Pleistocene age.
Ref. Rose, M. The Noah Code p. 284 Quoting Wormington, Hannah 1957 Ancient Man in North America
Note; Wormington was subsequently fired as curator of archeology at the Denver Museum shortly after publishing this volume.
Torrington, Wyoming
Four skeletons were discovered near Torrington, Wyoming, according to W. W. Howells (1938). The skeletons closely resemble those found at Lake Pelican. Unfortunately these bones were found during blasting activities but apparently were entombed in a sealed cave opened in the excavation process. Upon further investigation, the remains were determined to be that of an adult male, two females of differing ages, and an infant. It was stated that the remains and artifacts resembled many other such finds across the continent in their condition of covering and ethnicity.
New Orleans Man
The original report on this find, usually credited to D. B. Dowler, is by Prof. D. Drake, reads as follows: “In 1844, I visited two gas tanks, each 60 feet in diameter and 16 feet deep, recently sunk in the back part of the city [i. e., New Orleans] and received from the intelligent superintendent, Doctor Rogers, an account of what was met with in excavating them. At first they encountered soil and soft river mud, then harder laminated blue alluvion, then deep black mold resting on wet bluish quicksand. The roots and the basis or stumps of no fewer than four successive growths (or stacks) of trees, apparently cypress, were found standing at different elevations. The first had a diameter of 2 feet 6 inches, the second of 6 feet, the third of 4 feet, and the fourth of 12 feet, at a short distance up, with a base of 28 feet for the roots. It is embedded in a soft deep-black mold. When cut with the spade much of this wood resembled cheese in texture, but hardened on drying. At the depth of 7 and 16 feet burnt wood was met with. No shells or bones of land animals or fish were observed, but in a tank previously excavated, at the depth of 16 feet the skeleton of a man was found. The cranium lay between the roots of a tree and was in a tolerable state of preservation, but most of the other bones crumbled on pressure. A small ossilium, which I saw, indicated the female sex.*
*Note: A similar “buried forest” is found near the shores of New Jersey, where for years loggers extracted the timbers of huge trees flattened to horizontal from some earlier watery catastrophe. Such buried forests also exist along the central Oregon coast near Pacific City and others were unearthed in a recent excavation along Hwy 20. These were c14 dated <40,000 years old.
In February 1866, a skull was removed by one Mr. Mattison, in Calaveras County from a layer of gravel 130 feet below the surface. Later a human jaw, also inspected by J. D. Whitney, State geologist at that time who researched its location and authenticity. The jaw was given to a Dr. Snell by miners, who stated it came from the gravels beneath the lava cap at Table Mountain in Tuolumne County, CA. Noted geologists Mr. George H. Baker, Mr. King along with Professor Marsh, Professor Putnam and W. H. Dall attested to the fact that the Calaveras skull was found in place beneath a stream of gravel in the Table formation beneath this same stream of lava. Their position indicates they were over 30 million years old, in modern terms.
Wright, Frederick G. Science 20:275-27 1892
Speaking about the Whitney papers on these finds; in August, 1879, AAAS President and foremost paleontologist O. C. Marsh, stated: “The proof offered on this point by Professor J. D. Whitney in his recent work (Aurif. Gravels of Sierra Nevada) is so strong, and his careful, conscientious method of investigation so well known, that his conclusions seem irresistible. At present, the known facts indicate that the American beds containing human remains and works of man, are as old as the Pliocene of Europe. The existence of man in the Tertiary period seems now fairly established.”[I]
Ref. Rose, M. The Noah Code p. 279
Human Skull Found at Stanford, Menlo Park, CA
While excavating for a building project, scientists from Stanford discovered mastodon remains 22 feet below ground level near the campus. The observing scientists recalled an earlier find of a modern human skull found by Bruce Seymour, a Stanford University student, who found this skull twenty feet below the surface in the bank of San Francisquito Creek, at the same depth and strata of the Mastodon. The skull was cemented in a gravel stratum on which an alluvial cone had been formed. Bailey Willis (a competent geologist that had worked closely with Hrdlicka*) visited the locality, and determined that a considerable period of time must have been required for the formation of the alluvial cone which overlay the gravel, and for the cutting of the present creek bed. He suggested that the skull might have been deposited more than 4,000 years ago. According to Wormington, Willis is a capable geologist, likely to be “extremely cautious in supporting claims for the antiquity of human remains.” (Wormington 1957) The skull, which was studied by T. D. McCown (see Early Man in the New World, 1950) deter- mined it was a “male between thirty-five and forty-five years old.” The phys- ical and chemical condition of the specimen made it appear unlikely that it could be very recent. Researchers discussing the implications quoted Dr. J.W. Gidley as stating: “If this mastodon is of the late Miocene or early Pliocene as D. Blackwelder says it is, that sets it (the skull) back some two or three million years. And we have no evidence man has been here that long.”
Los Angeles Skeletons
In 1914, a complete human skeleton, animal bones and artifacts were found in a Los Angeles area tar pit. Later in 1924, at Angeles Mesa, six skeletons were found (Heizer, 1950) at depths of nineteen to twenty-three feet below the surface. Later, more finds surfaced as part of the excavation in 1936 when workmen were digging a storm drain beneath the Los Angeles River. This find revealed more human bones, including a partial human cranium and seven fragments of other bones at depths of twelve to thirteen feet below grade. The bones and cranium were mineralized and coated heavily with sandstone and conglomerate. Extinct animal bones were also discovered two months later in the same stratum. A. Lopatin, of the University of Southern California excavated two teeth later identified as those from an Imperial Mammoth. The geologic study of the associated stratum was con- ducted by Thomas Clements, a well known geologist who concluded they were of Pleistocene age.
Ref. Rose, M. The Noah Code p. 284 Quoting Wormington, Hannah 1957 Ancient Man in North America
Note; Wormington was subsequently fired as curator of archeology at the Denver Museum shortly after publishing this volume.
Torrington, Wyoming
Four skeletons were discovered near Torrington, Wyoming, according to W. W. Howells (1938). The skeletons closely resemble those found at Lake Pelican. Unfortunately these bones were found during blasting activities but apparently were entombed in a sealed cave opened in the excavation process. Upon further investigation, the remains were determined to be that of an adult male, two females of differing ages, and an infant. It was stated that the remains and artifacts resembled many other such finds across the continent in their condition of covering and ethnicity.
New Orleans Man
The original report on this find, usually credited to D. B. Dowler, is by Prof. D. Drake, reads as follows: “In 1844, I visited two gas tanks, each 60 feet in diameter and 16 feet deep, recently sunk in the back part of the city [i. e., New Orleans] and received from the intelligent superintendent, Doctor Rogers, an account of what was met with in excavating them. At first they encountered soil and soft river mud, then harder laminated blue alluvion, then deep black mold resting on wet bluish quicksand. The roots and the basis or stumps of no fewer than four successive growths (or stacks) of trees, apparently cypress, were found standing at different elevations. The first had a diameter of 2 feet 6 inches, the second of 6 feet, the third of 4 feet, and the fourth of 12 feet, at a short distance up, with a base of 28 feet for the roots. It is embedded in a soft deep-black mold. When cut with the spade much of this wood resembled cheese in texture, but hardened on drying. At the depth of 7 and 16 feet burnt wood was met with. No shells or bones of land animals or fish were observed, but in a tank previously excavated, at the depth of 16 feet the skeleton of a man was found. The cranium lay between the roots of a tree and was in a tolerable state of preservation, but most of the other bones crumbled on pressure. A small ossilium, which I saw, indicated the female sex.*
*Note: A similar “buried forest” is found near the shores of New Jersey, where for years loggers extracted the timbers of huge trees flattened to horizontal from some earlier watery catastrophe. Such buried forests also exist along the central Oregon coast near Pacific City and others were unearthed in a recent excavation along Hwy 20. These were c14 dated <40,000 years old.
Texas Finds and Midland Man
The “Midland Man” was actually a female. In 1953, Keith Glasscock recovered artifacts and human remains in a grey sand “blow out” near Midland, TX. The finds were located below five layers of water deposited sediments, totaling nearly sixty feet of overburden (see The Noah Code p.. The skeletal remains, parts of a skull and two fragmentary ribs, are thought to be the oldest in North America. The location was named the Scharbauer site after the property owner. Remains of extinct antelope, horse, mammoth and bison were found with the subject. A number of arrow points were also recovered. Chemical analysis of the bones showed the human and animal remains were contemporary of each other. Here again we have a sedimentary waterborne deposit, containing human remains, found to be buried at a time period closely associated with other such finds in North America. In addition, the team mentioned that the skull was of the elongated type, as found in other Texas excavations buried catastrophically in water borne tombs. Also in Texas, skeletons with very long, narrow heads were unearthed in number. The subject was of considerable study and comment by Hooton, 1933; Roberts, 1945; and Woodbury, 1935. The remains were found in deeply buried silts (water deposits), but are little mentioned or publicized.
(Wormington Ancient Man in North America 1957)
Lyell, Mississippi Find and the Bias
Charles Lyell first visited this country in 1850 and witnessed with his own eyes (to his consternation) the recovery of human remains 30 feet below the surface in association with extinct animals, just as in hundreds of locations across Europe! Speaking of the discovery, Lyell records: “It appeared to be the bone of a man, in the same state of preservation, and was of the same dark color as the other fossils, and was believed to have come like them from a depth of about thirty feet from the surface.”
Lyell goes on to urge that until other like specimens could be found, this case must be overlooked. He rationalizes the site as possibly that of a native graveyard. At this juncture it’s worthwhile to quote the presiding witness who made the discovery in the first place, Dr. Dickeson. Documenting this find in contradiction to Lyell’s comments, Dickeson stated the human re- mains were taken from a uniform and undisturbed bed of blue clay, two feet below the skeletons of the megalonyx (mastodon) and other extinct quadrupeds. The discoverer tells us: “The bone is that of a young man of about sixteen years of age, as determined by its size and form. That this bone is strictly in the fossil state, is manifest from its physical characters, in which it accords in every respect of color, density, with those of the megalonyx and other associated bones. That it could not have drifted into the position in which it was found is manifest from several facts: 1) the plateau of blue clay is not appreciably acted upon by those causes that produce ravines in the superincum bent diluvium, 2) That the human bone was found at least two feet below three associated skeletons of the megalonyx, all of which, judging from the apposition or proximity of their several parts, had been de- posited in this locality. And lastly, because there was no admixture of diluvial drift with the blue clay, which latter retains its homogeneous character equally in the higher part that furnished extinct quadrupeds, and in its lower part that contained the remains of man.”
Rose, M. 2017 The Noah Code p. 254-6
The Soda Bar Colorado Find
Soon after Lyell’s visit to America, miners discovered human remains twenty-two feet below the surface in the Soda Bar Colorado gold mines in 1860.* The skeletal remains were found lying facedown beneath gravel and boulders in the rocky deposits at Soda Bar, high in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Still intact were the larger bones and skull, found to be fully modern. Witnessing the find, Mr. L. Berthond,* reported to the Academy of Science at Philadelphia in 1866: “[it] was a point conclusively shown, namely, that prior to the cause which covered Soda Hill, Soda Bar, and Dry Diggings Hill with its enormous beds of gravel, sand and boulders, and its native gold, man roved and dwelt in this region.” Along with the bones a pine tree was found two feet beneath in strata called “red rock.” The tree observed had its bark charred and disintegrated upon contact with the air. It would not be a stretch to surmise the tree was exposed to tremendous heat, then covered by sediments carried by moving water, nor to guess that the body was deposited then covered by the water transported gravel and boulders. Hence this find represents yet another important discovery conveniently omitted from the modern literature.
*Berthond concluded: “We confess that our preconceived notions of the antiquity of this Globe have received a severe shock by this discovery, and have modified our views as to the antiquity of the strata in this part of the Globe in this part of the continent…”
Divide Found in New Mexico
At the Sandra Cave in the Las Huertas Canyon, New Mexico, were found a variety of man-made implements together with the fossil remains of such animals as the horse, camel, bison, mammoth, ground sloth, and wolf. The cave was initially discovered by treasure hunters on the lower slope of Bishops Cap, the principal a Mr. Roscoe Conkling of El Paso, TX. Intrigued by its soft floor, a party was formed and returned to the site along with an expert witness. Excavations commenced in the presence of a recognized authority, Mr. William Bryan, invited to be on hand to witness any potential fossils of importance and to verify the geological sequence of the excavation. Digging down through the layers, bones of animals now extinct began to be exposed and removed. To the shock of all present, suddenly a human skull cap appeared at the 12 foot level. Further down in the water deposited sediment layers, a hard sandstone lens was encountered. When this layer was broken through, another skull was found, along with remains of other animals including a camel at nearly 21 feet in depth. Several archaeologists commented that this finding was of national significance, but for one reason or another, Bryan’s impressive report* never made it into the textbooks or literature and was sidelined into obscurity.
*Bryan, William Alanson; Science, 70:39-41 1929 New Mexico
The “Midland Man” was actually a female. In 1953, Keith Glasscock recovered artifacts and human remains in a grey sand “blow out” near Midland, TX. The finds were located below five layers of water deposited sediments, totaling nearly sixty feet of overburden (see The Noah Code p.. The skeletal remains, parts of a skull and two fragmentary ribs, are thought to be the oldest in North America. The location was named the Scharbauer site after the property owner. Remains of extinct antelope, horse, mammoth and bison were found with the subject. A number of arrow points were also recovered. Chemical analysis of the bones showed the human and animal remains were contemporary of each other. Here again we have a sedimentary waterborne deposit, containing human remains, found to be buried at a time period closely associated with other such finds in North America. In addition, the team mentioned that the skull was of the elongated type, as found in other Texas excavations buried catastrophically in water borne tombs. Also in Texas, skeletons with very long, narrow heads were unearthed in number. The subject was of considerable study and comment by Hooton, 1933; Roberts, 1945; and Woodbury, 1935. The remains were found in deeply buried silts (water deposits), but are little mentioned or publicized.
(Wormington Ancient Man in North America 1957)
Lyell, Mississippi Find and the Bias
Charles Lyell first visited this country in 1850 and witnessed with his own eyes (to his consternation) the recovery of human remains 30 feet below the surface in association with extinct animals, just as in hundreds of locations across Europe! Speaking of the discovery, Lyell records: “It appeared to be the bone of a man, in the same state of preservation, and was of the same dark color as the other fossils, and was believed to have come like them from a depth of about thirty feet from the surface.”
Lyell goes on to urge that until other like specimens could be found, this case must be overlooked. He rationalizes the site as possibly that of a native graveyard. At this juncture it’s worthwhile to quote the presiding witness who made the discovery in the first place, Dr. Dickeson. Documenting this find in contradiction to Lyell’s comments, Dickeson stated the human re- mains were taken from a uniform and undisturbed bed of blue clay, two feet below the skeletons of the megalonyx (mastodon) and other extinct quadrupeds. The discoverer tells us: “The bone is that of a young man of about sixteen years of age, as determined by its size and form. That this bone is strictly in the fossil state, is manifest from its physical characters, in which it accords in every respect of color, density, with those of the megalonyx and other associated bones. That it could not have drifted into the position in which it was found is manifest from several facts: 1) the plateau of blue clay is not appreciably acted upon by those causes that produce ravines in the superincum bent diluvium, 2) That the human bone was found at least two feet below three associated skeletons of the megalonyx, all of which, judging from the apposition or proximity of their several parts, had been de- posited in this locality. And lastly, because there was no admixture of diluvial drift with the blue clay, which latter retains its homogeneous character equally in the higher part that furnished extinct quadrupeds, and in its lower part that contained the remains of man.”
Rose, M. 2017 The Noah Code p. 254-6
The Soda Bar Colorado Find
Soon after Lyell’s visit to America, miners discovered human remains twenty-two feet below the surface in the Soda Bar Colorado gold mines in 1860.* The skeletal remains were found lying facedown beneath gravel and boulders in the rocky deposits at Soda Bar, high in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Still intact were the larger bones and skull, found to be fully modern. Witnessing the find, Mr. L. Berthond,* reported to the Academy of Science at Philadelphia in 1866: “[it] was a point conclusively shown, namely, that prior to the cause which covered Soda Hill, Soda Bar, and Dry Diggings Hill with its enormous beds of gravel, sand and boulders, and its native gold, man roved and dwelt in this region.” Along with the bones a pine tree was found two feet beneath in strata called “red rock.” The tree observed had its bark charred and disintegrated upon contact with the air. It would not be a stretch to surmise the tree was exposed to tremendous heat, then covered by sediments carried by moving water, nor to guess that the body was deposited then covered by the water transported gravel and boulders. Hence this find represents yet another important discovery conveniently omitted from the modern literature.
*Berthond concluded: “We confess that our preconceived notions of the antiquity of this Globe have received a severe shock by this discovery, and have modified our views as to the antiquity of the strata in this part of the Globe in this part of the continent…”
Divide Found in New Mexico
At the Sandra Cave in the Las Huertas Canyon, New Mexico, were found a variety of man-made implements together with the fossil remains of such animals as the horse, camel, bison, mammoth, ground sloth, and wolf. The cave was initially discovered by treasure hunters on the lower slope of Bishops Cap, the principal a Mr. Roscoe Conkling of El Paso, TX. Intrigued by its soft floor, a party was formed and returned to the site along with an expert witness. Excavations commenced in the presence of a recognized authority, Mr. William Bryan, invited to be on hand to witness any potential fossils of importance and to verify the geological sequence of the excavation. Digging down through the layers, bones of animals now extinct began to be exposed and removed. To the shock of all present, suddenly a human skull cap appeared at the 12 foot level. Further down in the water deposited sediment layers, a hard sandstone lens was encountered. When this layer was broken through, another skull was found, along with remains of other animals including a camel at nearly 21 feet in depth. Several archaeologists commented that this finding was of national significance, but for one reason or another, Bryan’s impressive report* never made it into the textbooks or literature and was sidelined into obscurity.
*Bryan, William Alanson; Science, 70:39-41 1929 New Mexico
Reck’s Skeleton
In 1913, Professor Hans Reck of Berlin University was undertaking field investigations in the now famous site at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. One of his team noticed a protrusion and exposed a portion of a skeleton embedded in the strata. The workers labored to extract the remains out of hard rock with hammers and chisels, unearthing a fully modern human. The find was located in a layer classified as far too “old” by evolution standards, below finds of creatures the evolutionists claim are transitional to modern humans. In spite of this hard evidence, scientists claimed a recent burial for this find, now rarely mentioned in the literature. The Reck discovery would be quite destructive to modern interpretations of human origins, undermining Darwinian evolution at its basic level. The thinking of the day couldn’t tolerate a fully human skeleton located in strata dated at a time thought only to contain apes. Such rejections outline the bias of the science establishment, challenging its credibility as a whole regarding honest fossil interpretation and origins science in particular. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Reck
Cremo & Thompson Forbidden Archeology Torchlight Publishing 2011, used by permission
Castenedolo, Italy Finds
In 1860 geologist Giuseppe Ragazzoni from the Brescia Institute visited the area of Castenedolo, Italy, and made his remarkable discovery of four modern humans below 10 layers of water-deposited sediments. Quoting Ragazzoni: “Searching along a bank of coral for shells, there came into my hand the top portion of a cranium, completely filled with pieces of coral cemented with the blue-green clay characteristic of that formation. Astonished, I continued the search, and in addition to the top portion of the cranium I found other bones of the thorax and limbs, which quite apparently belonged to an individual of the human species.” Later excavations revealed more “modern” human remains, the total to include a man, woman and two chil- dren. This discovery was highly controversial at the time and was later sup- pressed. Later Giuseppe Sergi, a well-known anatomist from Rome, visited Ragazzoni in 1883 and verified the remains of the individuals, an adult male, female, and two children. A noted authority of his day, Sergi believed the Castenedolo skeletons were authentic. As the skeptical reactions flowed in from others around the world, he later summarized “By means of a despotic scientific prejudice, call it what you will, every discovery of human remains in the Pliocene has been discredited.” Robert A.S. Macalister in his Textbook of European Archaeology 1921, records his honest frustrations with the Castenedolo finds: “Whatever we may think of them, they have to be treated seriously…unearthed by a competent geologist, Ragazzoni, and examined by a competent anatomist, Sergi, there must be something wrong somewhere if they really belonged to the stratum in which they were found, this would imply an extraordinarily long standstill for evolution. It is much more likely that there is something amiss with the observations.” Finally and honestly Macalister asserts: “The acceptance of a Pliocene date for the Castenedolo skeletons would create so many insoluble problems that we can hardly hesitate in choosing between the alternatives of adopting or rejecting their authenticity.”
Ref: Cremo, Michael A.; Thompson, Richard L. Forbidden Archeology,Torchlight Publishing 2011 p. 422-32 Used by permission
Savona, Italy Skeleton
In 1850, while excavating for a church in Savona, Italy, a fully modern human skeleton was unearthed 10 feet below grade in a layer thought to be “millions” of years in geologic age. Geologists of the day put the age of the layer over 3 million years old, assuming uniformity. The presenter of the find, Arthur Issel observed: “The body was discovered in an outstretched position, with the arms extending forward, the head slightly bent forward and down, the body very much elevated relative to the legs, like a man in the water.” Animal bones were also found scattered with the human remains at the same layer. As this skeleton appeared to be washed in by water and was found face down trapped against a rock, it gives strong evidence that this person perished in the Flood. Savona is 75 miles inland from shore.
Ref: Cremo, Michael A.; Thompson, Richard L. Forbidden Archeology
Torchlight Publishing 2011 p. 422-435 Used by permission From The Noah Code 2017 Rose, M. p. 267
In 1913, Professor Hans Reck of Berlin University was undertaking field investigations in the now famous site at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. One of his team noticed a protrusion and exposed a portion of a skeleton embedded in the strata. The workers labored to extract the remains out of hard rock with hammers and chisels, unearthing a fully modern human. The find was located in a layer classified as far too “old” by evolution standards, below finds of creatures the evolutionists claim are transitional to modern humans. In spite of this hard evidence, scientists claimed a recent burial for this find, now rarely mentioned in the literature. The Reck discovery would be quite destructive to modern interpretations of human origins, undermining Darwinian evolution at its basic level. The thinking of the day couldn’t tolerate a fully human skeleton located in strata dated at a time thought only to contain apes. Such rejections outline the bias of the science establishment, challenging its credibility as a whole regarding honest fossil interpretation and origins science in particular. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Reck
Cremo & Thompson Forbidden Archeology Torchlight Publishing 2011, used by permission
Castenedolo, Italy Finds
In 1860 geologist Giuseppe Ragazzoni from the Brescia Institute visited the area of Castenedolo, Italy, and made his remarkable discovery of four modern humans below 10 layers of water-deposited sediments. Quoting Ragazzoni: “Searching along a bank of coral for shells, there came into my hand the top portion of a cranium, completely filled with pieces of coral cemented with the blue-green clay characteristic of that formation. Astonished, I continued the search, and in addition to the top portion of the cranium I found other bones of the thorax and limbs, which quite apparently belonged to an individual of the human species.” Later excavations revealed more “modern” human remains, the total to include a man, woman and two chil- dren. This discovery was highly controversial at the time and was later sup- pressed. Later Giuseppe Sergi, a well-known anatomist from Rome, visited Ragazzoni in 1883 and verified the remains of the individuals, an adult male, female, and two children. A noted authority of his day, Sergi believed the Castenedolo skeletons were authentic. As the skeptical reactions flowed in from others around the world, he later summarized “By means of a despotic scientific prejudice, call it what you will, every discovery of human remains in the Pliocene has been discredited.” Robert A.S. Macalister in his Textbook of European Archaeology 1921, records his honest frustrations with the Castenedolo finds: “Whatever we may think of them, they have to be treated seriously…unearthed by a competent geologist, Ragazzoni, and examined by a competent anatomist, Sergi, there must be something wrong somewhere if they really belonged to the stratum in which they were found, this would imply an extraordinarily long standstill for evolution. It is much more likely that there is something amiss with the observations.” Finally and honestly Macalister asserts: “The acceptance of a Pliocene date for the Castenedolo skeletons would create so many insoluble problems that we can hardly hesitate in choosing between the alternatives of adopting or rejecting their authenticity.”
Ref: Cremo, Michael A.; Thompson, Richard L. Forbidden Archeology,Torchlight Publishing 2011 p. 422-32 Used by permission
Savona, Italy Skeleton
In 1850, while excavating for a church in Savona, Italy, a fully modern human skeleton was unearthed 10 feet below grade in a layer thought to be “millions” of years in geologic age. Geologists of the day put the age of the layer over 3 million years old, assuming uniformity. The presenter of the find, Arthur Issel observed: “The body was discovered in an outstretched position, with the arms extending forward, the head slightly bent forward and down, the body very much elevated relative to the legs, like a man in the water.” Animal bones were also found scattered with the human remains at the same layer. As this skeleton appeared to be washed in by water and was found face down trapped against a rock, it gives strong evidence that this person perished in the Flood. Savona is 75 miles inland from shore.
Ref: Cremo, Michael A.; Thompson, Richard L. Forbidden Archeology
Torchlight Publishing 2011 p. 422-435 Used by permission From The Noah Code 2017 Rose, M. p. 267
Tournel human remains found in caves buried within the same time frame
Human Finds Emerge Across Europe
H.H. Howorth mentions: “Like those of the extinct animals, the human bones are buried deeply in undisturbed loess, &c. There is no pretense for saying that the human skeletons which have been hitherto found and which were for the most part disintegrated and scattered, were buried artificially. The ground where they have occurred is undisturbed ground, and it does not seem arguable therefore that the remains of man, anymore than the remains of the accompanying extinct animals, were artificially buried. If not artificially buried by his companions, I cannot understand how his remains, un- weathered and fresh, should have been overlain by great depths of loam and loess in situations far above the level of the rivers and their overflow, and in districts where such overflow, even when it occurs, only deposits layers of loam the thickness of brown paper at the most, except as I argued in the case of the extinct animals, by the operation of a great flood of waters.”
H.H. Howorth, The Mammoth and the Flood. The Noah Code Rose, M. p. 243
Tournal’s 1833 Call for Reason
Quoting M. Tournal’s works of 1833, Professor Fairholme tells us: “[The] French geologists were so powerfully struck with the mixture of human and other bones, in some of the caves in the south of France, that a more strict scrutiny was instituted; and the results were published in a paper by M. Tournal, jun., of Narbonne, in No. 52 of Annates de Chimte et de Physique, from which the following is a short extract: In speaking of human remains, M. Tournal says, “The heads of the geological world would have it that they were, in all cases, recent, and accidental; and their opinions had the effect of deciding the point as a subject unworthy of further discussion. However, the discovery of the caves of Aude, of Herault, and of Gard, in the south of France, offers to the observer a crowd of human bones, and of ancient pottery, mixed up in the very same mud with those of hyenas, tigers, lions, stags, and a number of other animals of lost kinds. Attention was, therefore, again called to the subject, and MM. Marcel de Serres, Jules de Christol, and myself, after an attentive and conscientious examination, have come to the conclusion, that all these objects are of the same date, and, con- subsequently, that man was contemporaneous with the animals now lost from the surface of the globe. Our conclusion was principally based on the equal alteration of the bones, and on the manner of their deposit in the caves. We have not hesitated, therefore, notwithstanding the repugnance which our observations may occasion, to proclaim our belief, that man exists in a fossil state.”
*Annates de Chitnle, February 1833 Rose, M. 2017 The Noah Code p. 271
At this juncture, we will end our tour of the human graveyards, hopefully providing the reader ample evidence with this small treatise. These finds conclusively demonstrate that the destruction of life in the course of the flood was general, and in fact was inclusive of humans as reported so thoroughly by many past authorities.
At war with the animals, or the abject failure of modern paleontology?
It’s generally true that of the early North American human artifacts, many are associated with mega-fauna, weapons and arrow points. A perplexing thought is this: when we recall the decrees given by God in early Genesis, speaking only of a vegetarian based food sustenance; “For to you this shall be your food” (Genesis 1:28) and the acknowledged use of agriculture in those times, one must wonder what happened. Why is man found everywhere with a spear in hand? The intent of the First Earth was to be a bloodless co-habitation of man and animals. However, what is generally determined from these relics both in Europe and America seems to be nothing less than man was at war with the animals.
As earlier mentioned, the Bible teaches that as part of judgment man will be driven to live in caves. Perhaps an earlier rebellion forced man to live in nomadic existence and constant warfare. The Bible provides few de- tails of life in the years leading up to the Flood, only that the people had digressed morally to a point where they thought “only of evil continually” (Genesis 6:5). Among the flood traditions in Appendix II, we learn more details concerning this period, when law and order in society apparently vanished from the earth. The point to be made is this: the remains we examine exist in the present and cannot tell their full tale. If we remember, the earth was first shaken by the opening of the great deep, and we may assume this means earthquakes struck the planet, possibly in magnitudes and frequencies never before experienced. Assuming this being the case, with rain falling in typhoon proportions and all available shelter destroyed, where else would the survivors go? It would be reasonable to assume most would flee to the caves as their last option to escape, both man and animal. The sad conclusion is that the people and these fearsome beasts would likely perish together in savage struggles, as so often indicated in the caves. The evidence for such constantly prevails in the excavations covered in this volume, suggesting the observed evidence actually represents a short period frozen in time, a mere snap-shot of the life and death struggle for survival within the first weeks of the Flood year. If this be the case, modern archeology and paleontology would be entirely in error relative to stories about early life, lacking this perspective. So it would appear early man lived in such a state constantly; but the in actual fact, this was not the case at all. Fires in caves would be an obvious response, all souls being soaked and cold due to the rain and resultant lower temperatures.
The words of Jesus seem to resound in what is found buried across this planet, both of animal and Man, so quoted from the Bible here:
"And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”
Matthew 24:39
H.H. Howorth mentions: “Like those of the extinct animals, the human bones are buried deeply in undisturbed loess, &c. There is no pretense for saying that the human skeletons which have been hitherto found and which were for the most part disintegrated and scattered, were buried artificially. The ground where they have occurred is undisturbed ground, and it does not seem arguable therefore that the remains of man, anymore than the remains of the accompanying extinct animals, were artificially buried. If not artificially buried by his companions, I cannot understand how his remains, un- weathered and fresh, should have been overlain by great depths of loam and loess in situations far above the level of the rivers and their overflow, and in districts where such overflow, even when it occurs, only deposits layers of loam the thickness of brown paper at the most, except as I argued in the case of the extinct animals, by the operation of a great flood of waters.”
H.H. Howorth, The Mammoth and the Flood. The Noah Code Rose, M. p. 243
Tournal’s 1833 Call for Reason
Quoting M. Tournal’s works of 1833, Professor Fairholme tells us: “[The] French geologists were so powerfully struck with the mixture of human and other bones, in some of the caves in the south of France, that a more strict scrutiny was instituted; and the results were published in a paper by M. Tournal, jun., of Narbonne, in No. 52 of Annates de Chimte et de Physique, from which the following is a short extract: In speaking of human remains, M. Tournal says, “The heads of the geological world would have it that they were, in all cases, recent, and accidental; and their opinions had the effect of deciding the point as a subject unworthy of further discussion. However, the discovery of the caves of Aude, of Herault, and of Gard, in the south of France, offers to the observer a crowd of human bones, and of ancient pottery, mixed up in the very same mud with those of hyenas, tigers, lions, stags, and a number of other animals of lost kinds. Attention was, therefore, again called to the subject, and MM. Marcel de Serres, Jules de Christol, and myself, after an attentive and conscientious examination, have come to the conclusion, that all these objects are of the same date, and, con- subsequently, that man was contemporaneous with the animals now lost from the surface of the globe. Our conclusion was principally based on the equal alteration of the bones, and on the manner of their deposit in the caves. We have not hesitated, therefore, notwithstanding the repugnance which our observations may occasion, to proclaim our belief, that man exists in a fossil state.”
*Annates de Chitnle, February 1833 Rose, M. 2017 The Noah Code p. 271
At this juncture, we will end our tour of the human graveyards, hopefully providing the reader ample evidence with this small treatise. These finds conclusively demonstrate that the destruction of life in the course of the flood was general, and in fact was inclusive of humans as reported so thoroughly by many past authorities.
At war with the animals, or the abject failure of modern paleontology?
It’s generally true that of the early North American human artifacts, many are associated with mega-fauna, weapons and arrow points. A perplexing thought is this: when we recall the decrees given by God in early Genesis, speaking only of a vegetarian based food sustenance; “For to you this shall be your food” (Genesis 1:28) and the acknowledged use of agriculture in those times, one must wonder what happened. Why is man found everywhere with a spear in hand? The intent of the First Earth was to be a bloodless co-habitation of man and animals. However, what is generally determined from these relics both in Europe and America seems to be nothing less than man was at war with the animals.
As earlier mentioned, the Bible teaches that as part of judgment man will be driven to live in caves. Perhaps an earlier rebellion forced man to live in nomadic existence and constant warfare. The Bible provides few de- tails of life in the years leading up to the Flood, only that the people had digressed morally to a point where they thought “only of evil continually” (Genesis 6:5). Among the flood traditions in Appendix II, we learn more details concerning this period, when law and order in society apparently vanished from the earth. The point to be made is this: the remains we examine exist in the present and cannot tell their full tale. If we remember, the earth was first shaken by the opening of the great deep, and we may assume this means earthquakes struck the planet, possibly in magnitudes and frequencies never before experienced. Assuming this being the case, with rain falling in typhoon proportions and all available shelter destroyed, where else would the survivors go? It would be reasonable to assume most would flee to the caves as their last option to escape, both man and animal. The sad conclusion is that the people and these fearsome beasts would likely perish together in savage struggles, as so often indicated in the caves. The evidence for such constantly prevails in the excavations covered in this volume, suggesting the observed evidence actually represents a short period frozen in time, a mere snap-shot of the life and death struggle for survival within the first weeks of the Flood year. If this be the case, modern archeology and paleontology would be entirely in error relative to stories about early life, lacking this perspective. So it would appear early man lived in such a state constantly; but the in actual fact, this was not the case at all. Fires in caves would be an obvious response, all souls being soaked and cold due to the rain and resultant lower temperatures.
The words of Jesus seem to resound in what is found buried across this planet, both of animal and Man, so quoted from the Bible here:
"And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”
Matthew 24:39